By far, it seems this has been the most talked about issue around the corner with professionals floating their comments upon various ideas, thoughts and functioning procedures. The topic started off with the observed behavior of an employee which was not upto the expected standards of the organisation and suggestions for termination of the same had been sought after from the team here. However, after several debatable discussions and viewpoints from our esteemed colleagues, few points need to be noticed here in parlance with the termination of the employee :-

1. Counsel with the employee
2. Termination should be the last option.
3. Apply the theory of `Discharge Simplicitoir'
4. Discuss the concerns which have been problematic for the office environment & the work culture.
5. Take his period into consideration (probabation or confirmed employee)
6. Give him an opportunity to improvise
7. Issue a warning letter

Let's hope the consideration of the mentioned points shall ease up the process of avoiding a termination or carrying out a termination process effectively.

Past few days saw active discussions on this topic which raised quite an interest amongst the chrm community and the views of all were of deep insight. Since few blogs are already dealing with core specialised areas, I thought of creating a blog to recollect the flashback of memories (dicsussions) that transpired at the maximum possible level. As for the above topic, I could gather these points :

1. Always Saying Yes to all situations is not the Right Attitude.
2. HR has to follow a model to avoid conflict of interest & decisions.
3. Disagreement can be conveyed without sounding unpleasant, being polite and yet being firm.
4. Communicate effectively, keeping aside the ego clashes.
5. Understand the background of the boss's decision.
6. Gather valid facts and figures to prove your point.
7. Don't say YES when you actually mean to say NO.

We can just mention that keeping a track of the above points shall take care of several signifiant issues and atrocities that might have had arised if were to disagree in a wrong manner.