Dear sumit,
Recently few High Courts (Kolkatta/Gujarat) have given judgment that; Special Allowance attracts PF. Extract: Instead paying it as basic - companies in order to avoid pf - have changed the nomenclature as special allowance - where as there seems to be no substantial logic or policy for paying special allowance - hence it should be treated as basic - and pf should be contributed.
Based on this judgment, RPFC had sent internal circular to all PF commissioners to regulate this during their inspection.
Hence it is better for the corporates to look into this seriously and regulate with top priority.
My suggestion it to pay as - conveyance allowance or professional development allowance - if it is not part of your salary structure. Regards, msantos
|