Think HR Think CHRM
Wednesday - 23 May 2012

CHRMGlobal.com on LinkedIn
Username : Password: Forgot Password?
Difference between KRA/KPA/KPI
Human Resources » Performance Management


Chrm Message From: abhi16march Total Posts: 17 Join Date: 23/09/2008
Rank: Executive Post Date: 25/09/2008 00:01:43 Points: 85 Location: India

Dear All,
Pls share ur views on KRA/KPA and KPI......nd wat is the difefrence between ths.....pls explain with good exapmles..

 

Thanks

Abhishek Tiwari

Chrm Message From: abhi16march Total Posts: 17 Join Date: 23/09/2008  
Rank: Executive Post Date: 25/09/2008 00:24:32 Points: 85 Location: India
thank u very much nath and subramani...thanks a lot for ur valuable info......it ll help me lot.....
Chrm Message From: rajeshroy Total Posts: 36 Join Date: 23/09/2008  
Rank: Executive Post Date: 25/09/2008 00:25:46 Points: 180 Location: India

You may follow these..

job analysis
Breaking down the complexity of a person's job into logical parts such as duties and tasks. It identifies and organizes the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to perform the job correctly. This is accomplished by gathering task activities and requirements by observation, interviews, or other recording systems. job description A formal statement of duties, qualifications, and responsibilities associated with a job.

Job analysis produces the following information about a job:

* Overall purpose ‑ why the job exists and, in essence, what the job holder is expected to contribute.

* Content ‑ the nature and scope of the job in terms of the tasks and operations to be performed and the activities to be carried out ‑ ie the processes of converting inputs (knowledge, skills and abilities) into outputs (results).

*Key result areas ‑ the results or outcomes for which the job holder is accountable.

*Performance criteria ‑ the criteria, measures or indicators that enable an assessment to be carried out to ascertain the degree to which the job is being performed satisfactorily.

Responsibilities ‑ the level of responsibility the job holder has to exercise by reference to the scope and input of the job; the amount of discretion allowed to makedecisions; the difficulty, scale, variety and complexity of the problems to be solved; the quantity and value of the resources controlled; and the type and importance of interpersonal relations.

* Organizational factors ‑ the reporting relationships of the job holder, ie to whom he or she reports either directly (the line manager) or functionally (on'matters concerning
specialist areas, such as finance or personnel management); the people reporting directly or indirectly to the job holder; and the extent to which the job holder is involved in teamwork.

Motivating factors ‑ the particular features of the job that are likely to motivate or demotivate job holders if, in the latter case, nothing is done about them.

Development factors ‑ promotion and career prospects and the opportunity to acquire new skills or expertise.

Environmental factors ‑ working conditions, physical, mental and emotional demands, health and safety considerations, unsocial hours, mobility, and ergonomic factors relating to the design and use of equipment or work stations.

Methods of Job Analysis

Several methods exist that may be used individually or in combination. These include:
• review of job classification systems

• incumbent interviews

• supervisor interviews

• expert panels

• structured questionnaires

• task inventories

• check lists

• open‑ended questionnaires

• observation

• incumbent work logs

A typical method of Job Analysis would be to give the incumbent a simple questionnaire to identify job duties, responsibilities, equipment used, work relationships, and work environment. The completed questionnaire would then be used to assist the Job Analyst who would then conduct an interview of the incumbent(s). A draft of the identified job duties, responsibilities, equipment, relationships, and work environment would be reviewed with the supervisor for accuracy. The Job Analyst would then prepare a job description and/or job specifications.

The method that you may use in Job Analysis will depend on practical concerns such as type of job, number of jobs, number of incumbents, and location of jobs.

Job Analysis should collect information on the following areas*

• Duties and Tasks The basic unit of a job is the performance of specific tasks and duties. Information to be collected about these items may include‑ frequency, duration, effort, skill, complexity, equipment, standards, etc.

• Environment This may have a significant impact on the physical requirements to be able to perform a job. The work environment may include unpleasant conditions such as offensive odors and temperature extremes. There may also be definite risks to the incumbent such as noxious fumes, radioactive substances, hostile and aggressive people, and dangerous explosives.

• Tools and Equipment Some duties and tasks are performed using specific equipment and tools. Equipment may include protective clothing. These items need to be specified in a Job Analysis.

• Relationships Supervision given and received. Relationships with internal or external people.

• Requirements The knowledges, skills, and abilities (KSA's) required to perform the job. While an incumbent may have higher KSA's than those required for the job, a Job Analysis typically only states the minimum requirements to perform the job.

Choice of method

In the selection of a method of job analysis, the criteria for choice are the purpose for which it will be used, its effectiveness in obtaining the data required, the degree of expertise required to conduct the analysis and the resources and amount of time available for the analysis programme. The following is a summary of the advantages or disadvantages of each method:

*Interviewing ‑ this is the basic method of analysis and, as such, is the one most commonly used. It requires skill on the part of the analyst and is time consuming. Analysts need to be trained, and their effectiveness is increased by the use of a checklist.

*Questionnaires, checklists and inventories ‑ these can be a useful aid in helping individuals to describe their jobs and they save interviewing time. But it may still be necessary to invest a lot of time in constructing and evaluating questionnaires, which, ideally, should be related to the particular job. They may fail to reveal the full flavour of the job. If they are over‑generalized it will be too easy for job holders to provide vague or incoherent answers.

*Observation ‑ the most accurate technique for analysing job content (what people actually do). But it is so time‑consuming that it is seldom used except when preparing training specifications for manual or clerical jobs.

*Self‑description ‑ this is the quickest and most economic form of job analysis. But it relies on the often limited ability of people to describe their own jobs. It is therefore necessary to provide them with guidance in the form of questionnaires and checklists.
*Diaries and logs ‑ most useful for managerial jobs but they make great demands on job holders and can be difficult to analyse.

•Hierarchical task analysis ‑ this provides a helpful structure for job analysis in terms of outputs ‑ a particularly useful feature of this approach ‑ plans (inputs) and relationships. It can be used when analysing the data obtained by interviews or other methods.

Chrm Message From: hdblue Total Posts: 2 Join Date: 23/09/2008  
Rank: Beginner Post Date: 10/03/2011 23:31:25 Points: 10 Location: India

Dear friends

 

I like Difference between KRA/KPA/KPI  very much.

 

Very useful for me.

 

Rgs


Previous 1 2
 
Events
 
Related Discussion
KPI /Ojectives / Job Resp
Difference Between Rich/P
Is Dressing sense(Womens)
The Difference Between Ri
Difference b/w Recruitmen
KRA in MBA department
Interview Difference b/w
Job and Role (Difference)
Linking HR KRA's to Incen
Setting of KRA
 
Related Articles
Recruitment and Staffing:
Biodata, Résumé, Curricul
Managing and Supervision
HR and Business HR – The
There's a very thin line
The difference between Po