Joy,
Ask him to ignore/refuse unreasonable & restrictive conditions imposed by his employer which defeat the objectives of mobility of labour in a free & fair market. Even if such a condition had been stipulated in the original appointment offer(not to take up employment with a Competitor company), it is an 'unfair & unreasonable' condition, somewhat analogus to a condition that says a worker 'should not join a trade union'. There is no specific law other than the general law of contracts & equity to seek legal redressal / remedy. In my personal opinion, this kind of contract in a very broad context " defeats or goes against public policy " & is therefore void in law. It could also be voidable as far as your friend's situation goes, i.e. he can even after signing such a contract opt out of it at a later date,while observing all other conditions forming part of the appointment offer including the non-disclosure agreement. In fact the non-disclosure agreements are also seen under a microscopic lens by courts to check if there are 'justifiable & genuine grounds' in the clauses / conditions contained in it as also the 'category of employment / industry' to which it applies. All that is stated above is based on the presumption that your friend is in the Executive Cadre where he does not enjoy protection under any Labour legislation. In the case of he being a non-executive employee, he can seek redressal under the Indl. Disputes Act and/or Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act. Regarding non issue of relieving letter, I feel, he should post his resignation letter by registered post ack due, & inter alia mention in it the date on which he is effectively quitting the company as per the terms & conditions of his employment. He can show this along with his last salary slip as proof of service with this company, to any other company he proposes to join.
Over to the group for further debate.
Regards,
Jaspreet Gill |