Community » HR Forums » Self Excellence » Personal Development» Food for Thought
Food for Thought

Last post June 20, 2007 22:04 PM by rahul mishra. 1 repiles.

June 20, 2007 09:58 PM 1
Total Posts: 41
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Rank: Executive
Post Date: June 20, 2007
Posts: 41
Location: United States

Food for Thought

Dear Friends,

A group of children are playing near two railway tracks, one still in use while the other disused. Only one child is playing on the disused track,the rest on the operational track. The train comes, and you are just beside the track interchange. You could make the train change its course to the disused track and save most of the kids.

However, that would also mean the lone child playing by the disused track would be sacrificed. Or would you rather let the train go its way?

Let's take a pause to think what kind of decision we could make.

Most people might choose to divert the course of the train, and sacrifice only one child.

You might think the same way, I guess.

Exactly, I thought the same way initially because to save most of the children at the expense of only one child was rational decision most people would make, morally and emotionally.

But, have you ever thought that the child choosing to play on the disused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place?

Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was.

This kind of dilemma happens around us everyday. In the office, community, in politics and especially in a democratic society, the minority is often sacrificed for the interest of the majority, no matter how foolish or ignorant the majority are, and how farsighted and knowledgeable the minority are.

The child who chose not to play with the rest on the operational track was sidelined.

And in the case he was sacrificed, no one would shed a tear for him.

The friend who forwarded me the story said he would not try to change the course of the train because he believed that the kids playing on the operational track should have known very well that track was still in use, and that they should have run away if they heard the train's sirens.

If the train was diverted, that lone child would definitely die because he never thought the train could come over to that track!

While we are all aware that life is full of tough decisions that need to be made, we may not realize that hasty decisions may not always be the right one.

Any comments or views ?

Hrushikesh

June 20, 2007 10:002
anandsharma
Total Posts: 27
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Rank: Executive
Post Date: June 20, 2007
Points: 135
Location: United States

Re: Food for Thought

point appreciated ...for the hasty decision making
but y u restricted yurself till the train and child...
i think if the train was diverted and the child b sacrificed, that wont b the lone casualty..
there wud b more casualties...
the whole of train would be losing its way, its destination and ofcourse the passengers wud also be probable casualties if the disused track is a dead end...

so rightly said, hasty decisions lead to casualties ...more of those which arise bit later after the diversions and r subtler!!!!

and the worst is....WE ALL DO THIS!!!!

June 20, 2007 10:043
rahul mishra
Total Posts: 32
Join Date: August 29, 2006
Rank: Executive
Post Date: June 20, 2007
Points: 160
Location: United States

Re: Food for Thought

Hello,

Both options, especially that of diversion, operate on the assumption that something needs to be done at all. It is probable that the kid(s) would hear/see the train and move out of the way. The probability of this happening is much higher when there is a group of kids around..

Regards

Rahul