Community » HR Forums » Human Resources » Coaching & Mentoring» Assessment Center and Psychological Tests
Assessment Center and Psychological Tests

Last post May 7, 2012 20:37 PM by jigar. 1 repiles.

May 6, 2012 08:47 PM 1
Total Posts: 36
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Rank: Executive
Post Date: May 7, 2012
Posts: 36
Location: United States

Assessment Center and Psychological Tests

Hi,

To complement the earlier post of Jaswinder, let us look at the difference between Assessment Center and Psychological Tests.

Psychological tests are primarily designed to assess individual differences and make normative or comparative statements and evaluations about individuals. Thus, psychological testing tends to be measurement-oriented. Psychological assessment, on the other hand, focuses on an in-depth description of the individual, usually on the basis of scores or performance on a multitude of tests. Therefore, psychological assessment tends to be more problem-oriented.

A psychological assessment can be thought of as a process that takes an in-depth look at an individual. The goal of psychological assessment is to better understand what the individual is like. Specifically, it is a measurement and description of an individual's personality, behavior patterns, and intellectual characteristics. A psychological assessment can help develop a picture about a person. In the context of organizations, the assessment can be used to predict how the individual may perform in the organization by evaluating individual characteristics in relation to a specific criterion. This information can then be used to make decisions. From a developmental or training perspective, it can also identify strengths and weakness-the first step in designing an individual development program.

There are three intertwined steps in psychological assessment:

•First, the problem must be identified (e.g., What question needs to be answered? What are the company's needs?). The problem could be whether a promotion candidate can successfully perform at a mid-level manager position. The definition of "successful" may vary from one organization to another.

•The second step is data collection. This step determines what kind of data to collect and how to collect it. Psychological tests and inventories are the primary methods of collecting such data in organizational settings. Psychological assessment is a process that uses psychological tests as a method to collect information about an individual's knowledge, skills, abilities, attitudes, and other characteristics.

•The third step is interpreting the data or finding the solution to the problem. Making inferences from the results of psychological tests is a well-established and well-researched area. Establishing the validity of test scores is explained in more detail later in this document. To complete the assessment, feedback, or the results of the assessment, are given to the candidate and/or the requesting manager. 

The use of psychological assessment

Psychological assessments have expanded so much over the years that they can now measure aptitudes and achievement, personality, and interests. They are used in several fields, including industry, schools, clinical settings, and the military. In each context psychological assessments can be used to make better decisions.

Psychological assessments have been used in business since the 1930s. World War II psychologists were hired by the military to determine the appropriateness of military personnel for specific duties. When the war ended, many psychologists were hired by large corporations to help select managers and determine their developmental and training needs.

Psychological assessments are widely used in both the private and public sector. Because it is a dynamic process, psychological assessments are greatly influenced by the context in which they occur. Information gathered by psychological assessments may be used to predict how an individual will perform in different work environments and contexts. Psychological assessments may also be used for a variety of purposes including final candidate selection, promotion, assessing training and developmental needs, career counseling, and succession planning. When psychological assessments are used for administrative purposes, the assumption is that some important aspect of behavior on the job can be predicted from assessment outcomes. Psychological assessment is useful to management because it provides a picture of the individual's knowledge, skills, and abilities, values and motivation, and preferred working environment.

Organizations can directly benefit from using scores or outcomes from psychological assessments for decision-making in various personnel functions. Personnel functions can be thought of as problems that psychological assessment can be used to solve. Examples of personnel problems include: Will this applicant be successful on the job? Where should this candidate be placed? Who should be promoted? What are the individual's training needs?

For selection, decision makers must predict whether or not a job applicant will be able to successfully perform a job. To do this as accurately as possible, two steps are needed: measurement and prediction. Psychological assessment does both. It measures how well an individual does on a job-related test, and then because test scores have previously been validated, the scores of the assessment can be used to predict whether the applicant will be able to successfully perform the job. Psychological assessment can determine if a person coming into an organization can perform the tasks required. In addition, psychological assessment can determine how well the person will fit into the organization (person-organization fit). Information on how well the applicant will be able to perform the tasks required by the job, and how well they will fit into the organization can benefit the organization by reducing turnover, and increasing productivity and job satisfaction.

Similarly, psychological assessment can help with placement once an applicant has been hired. In order to find the best person-job fit, information on the person can be compared with the characteristics needed for the job. By assessing person-job fit, an organization can ensure that its human capital is invested in a way that most benefits the organization.

Another major area psychological assessments can benefit organizations is through the identification of training and development needs. Psychological assessment can be designed to measure an individual's strengths and weaknesses related to successful job performance. Identification of strengths and weaknesses can provide information for training and development programs. Training is a multi-billion dollar industry. The ability to pinpoint specific individual training needs will save an organization money in training.

In addition to the previously mentioned personnel functions, psychological assessments can be used for competency-based and skill-based compensation and promotions, and as criterion data in the evaluation of organizational programs and interventions.

 Validity-Determining the quality or soundness of psychological assessment

There are obviously many uses for psychological assessments, but how do we know how good the assessment really is? There are two major psychometric properties that indicate a good psychological assessment: reliability and validity. Reliability refers to the consistency of scores obtained from an assessment. Because an assessment (or test) is usually given only once to an individual, it must be as accurate as possible. The more reliable the assessment, the more likely it will be a true reflection of the individual. Validity refers to the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of the inferences made from test scores. Validity is the scientific way of verifying that the specific use of the results of a psychological assessment is conceptually sound. Thus, validity is arguably the primary means of evaluating the quality or soundness of a psychological assessment.

Validity studies demonstrate whether the conclusions made in psychological assessments are accurate. This is accomplished by finding the empirical relationship between performance on the psychological assessment and performance on some criterion of interest-usually job performance, such as performance ratings, advancement, or turnover. If the psychological assessment (predictor) is any good, then one would expect better scores on the predictor to be associated with higher scores on the criterion (e.g., job performance). This established association between the psychological assessment and the criterion of interest supports the use of the assessment for those purposes.

Although many psychological assessments are done by private companies that do not publish their findings, there is support in the literature for the use of psychological assessment in organizations. Probably the most important research question is whether or not the method is valid. Does using psychological assessments really improve selection and development decisions? Researchers have demonstrated the accuracy of psychological assessments over the past 50 years.

Results generally show positive relationships between ratings based on psychological assessment reports and later supervisor performance ratings of the incumbent. In almost all research studies, psychological assessment as a predictor was successfully tied to the criteria of interest. psychological assessments are related to job performance ratingsv , research indicates that the method is a useful and valid scientific tool for organizations to employ.

Best Regards,

Ayesha

May 6, 2012 08:492
naidu
Total Posts: 4
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Rank: Beginner
Post Date: May 6, 2012
Points: 20
Location: United States

Re: Assessment Center and Psychological Tests

Thanks for sharing. Can u pls inform if MBTI test is to be run in the company for assessing the personality profile of people at all levels; how can we relate with training & development? Do we need to take some precautions before doing this test?
May 6, 2012 08:503
jaswinder
Total Posts: 51
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Rank: Manager
Post Date: May 6, 2012
Points: 255
Location: United States

Re: Assessment Center and Psychological Tests


Thank you for the appreciation. Yes, MBTI is a overused instrument and is still a good hereditary measure and can be used. But the recent advances in the field of Behavioral Sciences have clearly indicated a prefrence for running a battery of tests as against just one of them. It is good choose from amongst various tests of Herdity, Environmental, intelligence as well as core competencies. This will provide you with a much more comprehensive view of the individual being assessed so that your decisions will be that much more accurate.

 

May 6, 2012 08:524
naidu
Total Posts: 4
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Rank: Beginner
Post Date: May 6, 2012
Points: 20
Location: United States

Re: Assessment Center and Psychological Tests

That is what i had experienced that mere one test does not indicate true picture. Rather one may distrust these tools.

I am more information seeker...if u do not mind. Is it possible that the Mood, Present Circumstances, age etc, are hindering factors for true results. I do not know if it is repeated at different time under different above factors/ siuations..how the results wud b? But what is ur opinion as an expert?

I am apprehensive of getting right picture and that is how asking more clarifications...
What is ur recommendation, if i have to undertake these tests for plant..what type of test wud be gud for recruitment or assessment of overall personality (Including behavioral)?

naidu

May 6, 2012 08:535
srini
Total Posts: 163
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Rank: Leader
Post Date: May 6, 2012
Points: 815
Location: United States

Re: Assessment Center and Psychological Tests


Psychometric measures essentially evaluate only one of the dimensions of either heredity, or environment, or intelligence or competency and that is why one needs to run a battery of tests instead of just one of them. In each of these categories there are plenty of tests that are available. Again the danger is today on the net there are too many teaser tests that are more out to make some quick bucks than any real insight. Hence it is good to know the source or reputation of the organisation that has authored it.

srini

1 2 Next